Dispatch from Copenhagen

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to our RSS feed.

Major papers are reporting that a final deal has been reached in Copenhagen: the “Copenhagen Accord”

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/19/science/earth/19climate.html?hp

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/18/AR2009121800637.html?hpid=topnews

The Post has a link to a copy of the deal, but I’m not sure if this is the final final, or just close-to-final.  My reaction on a quick read-through is that this is a fig leaf that papers over most of the major conflicts.  Most of what is in this deal was already agreed to before Copenhagen.  There is a commitment to an aggregate reduction in global GHG emissions of 50% below 1990 levels by 2050, but still no firm numbers for 2020.  There is some important new language on monitoring and verification in Par. 5, and the agreement sets a new benchmark for financing: $100 billion + will now become the standard debated in future negotiations.

News outlets are reporting that an earlier draft from this morning set a deadline to complete a binding treaty by the next Conference of the Parties in Mexico City (scheduled for Dec. 2010).  This Accord has no firm deadline to conclude a treaty, but merely calls for “review of this Accord and its implementation” by 2016.  That’s a long way away.  If there is pressure to conclude a treaty, it won’t come from this document, but rather from domestic politics.

All in all, a very depressing document for a conference that carried such high expectations.

Noah

_______________________________________________

Noah Sachs

Associate Professor

Director, Merhige Center for Environmental Studies University of Richmond School of Law Richmond VA, 23173

804-289-8555

http://law.richmond.edu/faculty/nsachs.php

Related posts:

  1. Dispatch from Copenhagen
  2. Interesting Blog Dispatch
  3. Current negotiating positions of major emitters pre-Copenhagen
  4. Dispatch from the Bonn meeting
  5. Analysis of the Copenhagen Accord

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Leave a Reply