WRI Analysis of Annex I Emissions Reductions Pledges

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to our RSS feed.

As a follow-up on my post yesterday summarizing WWF’s new study on the implications of Annex I emissions reductions under the Copenhagen accord, here’s a summary of the World Resource Institute’s new analysis, Levin & Bradley, Comparability of Annex I Emission Reduction Pledges (2010).

The key points in the study:

  • The Annex I Parties’ emission reduction pledges would reduce emissions by 12-18% below 1990 levels by 2020, excluding Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) or 13-19% if one includes LULUCF. Thus, even the best case scenario for Annex I pledges are well below the lowest range of reductions in 2020 necessary to put us on a trajectory to potentially avoid a 2C increase in temperatures (25%) [Editor's note: it should be also noted that this would still result in a 78% risk of overshooting 2C according to Meinshausen in a 2005 study; even a 40% reduction in 2020 would still result in a 26% risk of overshoot];
  • If Annex I Parties agree to the lower range of the recommendations of the IPCC for 2020 to have a reasonable chance of avoiding overshooting 2C, they would then have to reduce their emissions by an additional 77% in the period of 2020-2050 if they reduce emissions by 2040; if they can achieve a 40% reduction, their emissions would only have to be reduced an additional 67% to achieve this goal;
  • If pledges by Annex I parties are not ratcheted up beyond the highest pledges, the additional reductions required between 2020 and 2050 would require emissions to drop about 2.5% annually between 2020 and 2050 to reach a goal of reducing Annex I emissions 80% below 1990 levels by mid-century, at which point “the potential turnover in capital stock may be well beyond what is technologically or politically feasible in a 30-year time period . . .”

This would be an excellent reading for students; it also includes some excellent data, including charts with emission reduction pledges for 2020; absolute emissions of Annex I parties for 1990, 2000, and 2005, and projected emissions, per capita emissions and emissions intensity in 2020 for Annex I Parties.

Related posts:

  1. New IIASA Analysis of Adequacy of Annex I Party Commitments
  2. Implications of Copenhagen Pledges
  3. New Report on Comparability of Efforts Requirements, Post Kyoto for Annex I Parties
  4. UNEP Analysis of How to Avoid Exceeding the 2C Limit
  5. New WRI Analysis of Copenhagen Commitments

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Leave a Reply